Original Title: "When OpenClaw Founder Advises Young People to Stay Away from Crypto"
Original Author: Golem, Odaily Planet Daily
On February 27, when a user on the X platform asked OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger for the "best advice for a 20-year-old," Peter Steinberger bluntly stated, "Don't waste time on cryptocurrency." As the founder of the current hottest AI product, Peter Steinberger has not hidden his disdain for cryptocurrency. He has warned cryptocurrency professionals not to harass him about it, and even mentioning Bitcoin in OpenClaw's Discord will result in a ban.
This harsh statement has sparked collective jokes and self-deprecation in the crypto community. However, unlike when the crypto market is in a downturn and cryptocurrency professionals chant "cryptocurrency is dead," when "don't waste time on cryptocurrency" is used as advice to young people by a top AI entrepreneur, this statement still stings the crypto industry.
It has put anxiety right in front of us — cryptocurrency is no longer the optimal solution for today's young people.
Recall 2011, when cryptocurrency OG, Bitcoin founder Chang Jiaoxian, suggested that college students spend all 6,000 RMB to buy Bitcoin, the response was considered one of the most powerful examples of the cryptocurrency industry's long-termism and suitability for young people to join. However, Chang Jiaoxian himself has not always stayed in the cryptocurrency industry. By 2023, Bitcoin had stopped publishing cryptocurrency-related information and shifted to publishing content in AI, metaverse, and other fields. In 2024, Chang Jiaoxian shifted to entrepreneurship in the AI field and completely disappeared from the crypto community.

The preemptive Chang Jiaoxian has caused much controversy, and now the fact that the crypto community is being siphoned by AI has become indisputable. Talent is migrating, capital is being reallocated, and attention is shifting.
Another cryptocurrency OG, Cobo co-founder and CEO Fish God, is also an early representative of the Bitcoin mining circle. As a multi-cycle survivor, Fish God often shares his personal understanding of market phases and investment insights on social media, which is highly welcomed in the crypto community.
However, recently Fish God has transitioned from a crypto OG to an AI blogger, with over 80% of the content on his social accounts in the past month being about OpenClaw, while crypto-related content is scarce. Fish God himself also humorously acknowledges his successful transition.

The Fish God's exploration and focus on AI have only remained at a personal level, with the company's business and personal career still primarily focused on crypto. Therefore, for now, we can interpret the Fish God's obsession with AI as a good habit of actively improving oneself during "market junk time" and keeping up with the cutting edge of the era. However, talent migration from crypto to AI is indeed happening.
One of zkSync's executives, Anthony Rose, announced on February 4th that after working for four years at Matter Labs, he will be leaving and most likely transitioning to AI. Nader Dabit, the Developer Advocate Director of EigenLayer, also announced on February 5th that he would be leaving EigenLayer to become a growth lead at an AI company, stating that he has "joined the future."
One of the most noteworthy recent examples of exiting the circle is Kyle Samani, the co-founder of Multicoin Capital, who announced his departure from the crypto industry to focus on AI, robotics, and other fields. Kyle Samani was known for his early bet on Solana, so his exit has somewhat shaken confidence in the crypto industry. Even more absurdly, on the day Kyle Samani left the circle, he also disparaged the cryptocurrency industry, saying, "Cryptocurrency is simply not as interesting as many people (including myself) once imagined."
Native crypto VCs are also unwilling to waste more time on the crypto industry.
According to The Wall Street Journal on February 28th, the crypto venture capital firm Paradigm is planning to raise a new fund focused on AI and robotics, with a fund size of up to about $1.5 billion. Paradigm is one of the purest native crypto capitals, gaining fame in 2019 for investing in and incubating Uniswap. Since then, its early investments in other crypto projects (such as Lido, Optimism, dYdX, Blur) have also been successful, making this "research-driven" VC institution on par with a16z crypto.
It is precisely because of this that Paradigm's shift is significant.
If crypto is still in a period of rapid innovation, continuously producing projects capable of attracting billion-dollar investments, Paradigm would not need to establish a separate heavy-weight fund for AI. However, the reality is that the crypto industry's infrastructure narrative (such as L1, L2, DEX, etc.) has become highly intertwined, and the number of truly high-quality early-stage projects with "paradigm-shifting" potential is now few and far between.
The entire crypto VC space has run out of good projects to invest in. Looking at the data, it is clear that the number of venture capital deals in the crypto industry has been decreasing year over year for the past four years. In 2022, there were 1639 crypto primary market financing deals, which dropped to 829 deals in 2025. The share of early-stage financing has also decreased from 50% to below 35%.

Source: One Year Later, What Can Still Be Traded in the Crypto Market?
When there are no viable investment options in the crypto industry, AI, as an industry at the forefront of the trend, naturally becomes the best destination for crypto capital deployment. From large foundational models to AI agents, from computing power chips to the robotics industry, AI can not only accommodate capital at scale but also continue to create growth narratives, making it the largest reservoir of global capital today.
For a VC managing over $12.7 billion in assets, the core proposition has never been about whether "faith is wavering" but rather about whether the "return function still holds." As the number of projects that the crypto industry can support decreases, a singular bet on crypto means an increase in portfolio risk and a decrease in return elasticity. In this scenario, continuing to insist on being "crypto-native" is irrational.
Therefore, Paradigm's proactive expansion into AI is also a trend-driven by the era, not a strategic issue of individual institutions but a signal of the industry stage.
In terms of market attention, Crypto is an industry that knows best how to ride the waves, whether it's a political hot topic, technological frontier, or social headline. Whenever there's a buzz, you can always see projects or memes related to the hype circulating in the crypto community. Whenever the AI industry experiences a technological upgrade or product innovation, the crypto community always has related "Crypto+AI" projects or meme coin hype to attract market attention.
When OpenClaw went viral, although the crypto community was quick to find angles to ride the wave, such as hyping meme coins of the same name, commanding OpenClaw to trade tokens autonomously, and placing bets on market predictions to earn money, crypto players later began to become more pure, shifting from "how to crypto-fy OpenClaw" to "how to truly use OpenClaw."
Many crypto researchers started sharing continuous OpenClaw installation and usage tutorials, openly sharing their AI workflows, going into detail on how to train personal AI agents to help with coding, investment research, content generation, etc. Some crypto KOLs even started offering side gigs to install OpenClaw for novices at a fee.
Offline AI exchange events organized by the crypto community are also attracting a full house. One of the most popular offline events recently is the "Web4 China Tour" led by crypto OG Kongjian Ping, which took place from February 25 to March 8 in five cities in China. The main topics were OpenClaw and Agent, with hardly any crypto-related content.
This is no longer about riding the hype but a real shift in focus. Crypto players who pride themselves on being forward-thinking are starting to fear falling behind in the AI era.

Full House at Crypto Community's Offline AI Event
Why are crypto professionals so obsessed with AI?
The crypto community is already the most concentrated industry of "super-individuals," with a large number of independent developers, traders, and content creators. These individuals naturally seek to enhance tool efficiency to compensate for the inefficiency of human effort. Therefore, when AI can significantly amplify personal productivity, crypto players will be among the first to embrace it.
Furthermore, the core of crypto culture itself has a strong geek spirit and tech worship. Although in recent years the "technology narrative" has been diluted, most crypto players still believe that "foundational technology can change the world." Now, AI embodies a more revolutionary technological essence than blockchain, naturally sparking wild enthusiasm among crypto players.
Of course, a more practical reason is the crypto market's lull, with AI continuously creating "new things," while Crypto has been restructuring old narratives. There is no native crypto innovation, no significant wealth effect. The entire crypto community is hanging by a thread on market predictions and the tiny externality brought by RWA. At this time, the new discussion topics and cognitive stimuli provided by the AI industry, rather than seizing crypto attention, are more like filling the spiritual void of crypto players after the market's pace has slowed down.
Finally, returning to the beginning of this article, the reason why the statement from the OpenClaw founder drew attention from the crypto community was not because it was disdainful but because it articulated a fact that many crypto individuals are quietly validating through action—the smartest ones are reallocating their time.
We are now facing a period of declining wealth generation rates and explosive technological productivity.
On the one hand, as the crypto cycle slows down, Alpha shrinks, and the wealth growth curve flattens, crypto players who relied solely on "information gathering - chasing hot trends - yield farming" in the past year are experiencing diminishing marginal returns. On the other hand, AI is compressing the "time needed to solve problems," with tasks like coding, content creation, and other activities that used to require a significant time investment now being completed by models in minutes, far more efficiently than individual humans.
When the "process volume of pursuing outcomes" is highly condensed by AI, we may actually have more free time to engage in activities that are not driven by efficiency and profitability — seeking "carbon-based meaning," experiencing the world, establishing a cognitive system independent of market fluctuations, and constructing our own value system.
In the future of AI, what may truly differentiate people and create gaps between them are perhaps aesthetics, independent judgment, and personal meaning construction.
Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:
Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Official Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia