BlockBeats news, November 4: Binance founder CZ reposted a long article and called it "another attack against Binance." According to the article's statistics, from 05:00 on October 30 to 20:00 on November 2, within about 78 hours, 1,083 accounts published 11,700 hostile posts about the Binance hot wallet theft incident, generating about 20.93 million impressions, of which 79.6% were replies, and 3,354 were judged to be false information across 15 categories of rumors. The article argues that alongside the real security incident, rhythmic and division-of-labor narrative operations appeared simultaneously on X, with themes switching according to Binance's response milestones, including insider involvement, insolvency, a second FTX, not daring to open withdrawals, a run once withdrawals opened, and exaggerated net outflows.
The article also states that among the 641 most active accounts, 452 had coordinated connections, and 444 formed the same connected network; 89% of the sample accounts normally posted no more than 0.2 Binance-related posts per day on average, but during the incident this rose to about 24.6 times the baseline. When withdrawals resumed in phases, the intensity of mobilization posts calling for immediate exit and bank runs reached 11.2 posts per hour, the peak narrative intensity across all phases.
