header-langage
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Tiếng Việt
Scan to Download the APP
Partnered With:

V god criticizes the "pass" approach of ProgPoW's proposal, which is "express first and then pass"

Read this article in 4 Minutes
In fact, the proposal is still under discussion, and the community developers have yet to agree on it.

According to BlockBeats, Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of ethereum, criticized the way some community members quietly "approved" the ProgPoW proposal. In fact, the proposal is still under discussion, and the community developers have yet to agree on it.


V god said, "ProgPoW from" yo, it is over, for a long time have not been filed a "suddenly in 1.5 hours becomes" oh my god, it is now being arranged in the agenda of the next hard bifurcation??! & have spent "", according to foreign media reports ETH1 developers abruptly announced on Friday:" the etheric fang core developers are pushing ahead with ASIC ProgPoW, hard bifurcate upgrade tentatively in July ". However, later, blockbeat learned that the core developers of ethereum had not reached an agreement on ProgPoW, nor had there been a tentative hard fork upgrade date.


"ProgPoW by" slip through "the way (the original words:" Ninja - Reapproved ") never help people or feel safe, trust management, so to speak, the twitter's more believe that they must be a loud and clear, simple and clear information (for example, in a twitter message must be simple, clear). In order to make their voice heard." Buterin said.


ProgPoW was an algorithmic change proposed two years ago, ostensibly to get rid of the miners of Asics, and in the months after the proposal was proposed there was a lot of discussion among community developers, with several eaeum members rejecting the proposal.


However, Hudson Jameson, eth1's "chairman", has previously said the scheme was a quid quo for changes to the block award that miners "accepted" earlier last year to cut to two eth each. From time to time, however, Jameson's development team announced that they had "approved" ProgPoW again.


V god said he was neutral on whether the matter would pass and only criticized the process. But three or four times in the past two years he has subtly made it clear that he does not quite agree with the proposal, without explicitly saying "no".


Original address:https://www.trustnodes.com/2020/02/24/vitalik-buterin-criticizes-the-ninja-reapproved-progpow



Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:

Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Official Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia

举报 Correction/Report
Choose Library
Add Library
Cancel
Finish
Add Library
Visible to myself only
Public
Save
Correction/Report
Submit