header-langage
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Tiếng Việt
한국어
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Türkçe
Scan to Download the APP
Partnered With:

The new provisions of the CLARITY Act are criticized for "failing to provide regulatory certainty," repeating the missteps of the old SEC era.

BlockBeats News, on June 10, according to disclosures by crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett, the U.S. House Financial Services Committee and Agriculture Committee conducted a markup session today on the CLARITY Act (the "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act"). Industry insiders have raised concerns over a new provision in the revised text, describing it as the "Gensler-era clause." This revision removes exemptions for previously issued tokens and instead grants the SEC broad powers to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether each token qualifies as a security. Critics argue that this approach reintroduces the very uncertainty the bill was meant to address.


The "Gensler era" refers to the regulatory approach taken during Gary Gensler's tenure as SEC Chair (from April 2021 to January 20, 2025). Under Gensler, the SEC became known for strict enforcement and a strategy of regulating through enforcement actions rather than providing a clear regulatory framework.

举报 Correction/Report
RelatedRecommended
The core issue of the Cryptocurrency Market Structure Clarity Act (CLARITY) is whether we should sacrifice the DeFi and Stablecoin innovation space in exchange for a quickly established federal regulatory framework.
Short-term legislative gridlock in Congress does not mean U.S. crypto regulation has come to a standstill.
This vote does not determine whether it becomes law, but only whether senators can begin formal discussions on it.
Correction/Report
Submit
Add Library
Visible to myself only
Public
Save
Choose Library
Add Library
Cancel
Finish