Vitalik: Governance structures need more multi-dimensional identity concepts, otherwise they will become centralized structures

BlockBeats news, on August 22, Vitalik posted, "I don't think the 'anonymous society' or even the 'financialized pseudonymous society' is really effective. A more dimensional concept of identity (with the characteristics of 'soul binding') seems to be necessary; if you don't do this, the most stable governance structure will only be a de facto centralized structure, and others will be attacked by financialized governance.

It can be said that even today we can see these problems at work in DAO. Anomymity is a check and balance that exists to run the 'dark side of the cycle', and it cannot run the entire cycle by itself. Just like you can't run a society with permanent rebellious energy.

Regarding x-risk, I think pluralistic thinking can actually help us more effectively identify x-risk mitigation measures that people can support." A user said: "I think we need the concept of a dual (or multiple) identity, rather than it often being framed as either this or that... The ideal is to be able to switch between them in one wallet."

Vitalik Agreed: "Make granular choices about how much to disclose, choosing the minimum feasible disclosure for each application. This is a principle that many zk applications are already designing on."