NewsFlash Articles Data Fundraising BlockBeats Pro

Half-Year $11.2 Billion Funding Flows: Crypto's Most Valuable Asset Shifting from Code to License

Read this article in 9 Minutes

In the first half of 2026, there were 377 crypto financings, with almost all disclosed funding flowing into regulated entity business models. Payment with stablecoins, prediction markets, and trading platforms emerged as the most favored tracks by capital.

Original Title: "Unveiling the $11.2 Billion Flow of Funds in Six Months: The Most Valuable Assets in the Crypto Industry Are Transitioning from Code to License"

Dubai crypto lawyer Irina Heaver and her team at NeosLegal did a simple yet powerful thing: they meticulously reviewed all publicly disclosed funding in the crypto industry in the first half of 2026, totaling 377 deals worth around $11.2 billion.

The conclusion can be summarized in one sentence: Every funding round with a disclosed amount flowed to businesses that require regulatory licenses to operate.

The top three funded sectors were: Payments and Stablecoins at $3.7 billion, Prediction Markets at $2 billion, and Exchanges & Trading Platforms at $1.7 billion. These three areas share a common feature where operating legally in any major jurisdiction requires a license.

The valuation logic of institutional capital in the crypto industry has shifted from "what code can do" to "do you have a license."

Who Is Writing the Checks

First, let's see who's footing the bill.

Kalshi raised $1 billion in May, with investors including Sequoia, Morgan Stanley, Ark Invest, and a16z. Polymarket secured $600 million, with Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, leading the round. Focused solely on prediction markets, Polymarket completed 34 funding rounds in just six months.

In the Payments and Stablecoins sector's $3.7 billion, names like BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and a Gulf sovereign wealth fund kept cropping up.

Vineet Budki, Managing Partner at Sigma Capital, bluntly stated: "Regulatory licenses have shifted from a compliance footnote to a core valuation metric."

Behind this assessment lies hard math; obtaining a MiCA license or a Dubai VARA permit typically takes 18 to 24 months and costs millions of dollars. While code can be forked over a weekend, a license cannot. When VCs evaluate two similar projects, the one with a license naturally possesses a moat that a competitor cannot quickly replicate.

Licenses Are the New Moat

View this phenomenon through a longer timeline.

In the 2020-2021 period, the main focus of crypto funding was on protocols and infrastructure. Public blockchains, DeFi protocols, and NFT platforms took most of the VC money. The investment thesis revolved around technological barriers and network effects - the higher the TVL and the more active the developer ecosystem, the more valuable the project.

Looking ahead to 2022-2023, a bear market washed out a wave of purely narrative-driven projects, and funding started tilting towards businesses with actual revenue. The funding share of exchanges, wallets, and infrastructure companies increased.

Data from the first half of 2026 shows that this trend has reached its logical conclusion: Capital is no longer funding technology innovation per se but rather the ability to operate technology innovation within a compliance framework. In other words, while code is a necessary condition, a license is now a sufficient condition.

This trajectory closely mirrors the evolution of the traditional financial industry. In the early 2010s, fintech companies disrupted finance through technology, but by the end of the 2010s, they were securing funding based on their licensing and regulatory capabilities. Stripe, valued at hundreds of billions, built a core moat around its ability to operate compliantly in over 40 countries, far exceeding the technological gap of its payment API.

The crypto industry is following a similar path, just at a faster pace.

Funding Trends and User Activity Are Diverging

However, this dataset has a critical blind spot: it only accounts for funding and not for users.

On-chain data shows that in the first half of 2026, the TVL, DEX trading volume, and the number of active addresses of DeFi protocols were all on the rise. Daily active users and transaction volumes on permissionless protocols like Uniswap, Aave, and Jupiter have not dwindled just because VC money has shifted elsewhere. Retail users continue to transact, lend, and provide liquidity on-chain.

This implies a more nuanced split is occurring rather than the "death of permissionless protocols": Institutional capital is moving towards compliant, licensed centralized businesses, while retail user activity remains distributed across permissionless on-chain markets. Money and people are flowing in two directions.

This divergence is most evident in the prediction market space. Both Kalshi and Polymarket operate prediction markets, but Kalshi is a CFTC-registered exchange, while Polymarket lacks a license in the U.S. Kalshi has secured $1 billion in funding and has the endorsement of Morgan Stanley, while Polymarket has raised $600 million with ICE's endorsement. Both are moving towards compliance, but their user bases and product experiences still exhibit significant differences.

A Redefinition of "Value"

Heaver used a precise phrase in an interview: Capital is no longer chasing permissionlessness but regulated business.

The profound implication of this shift is that the concept of "valuable assets" in the crypto industry is being redefined. In 2021, the most valuable asset was a widely forked smart contract protocol. By 2026, the most valuable asset may be a MiCA electronic money license covering the 27 EU countries, or an entity holding a financial services license in Abu Dhabi's ADGM.

Code still matters. But while code solves the "can it be done" question, a license solves the "is it allowed to be done" question. When $1.2 billion in institutional capital votes with their feet to tell you that the latter is more scarce and valuable, the power center of this industry has already shifted.

For developers, this may not necessarily be bad news. Permissionless protocols can operate without VC money; they have token incentives, a community, and on-chain revenue. But for entrepreneurs, the fundraising reality of 2026 is already clear: If you want institutional money, get a license first.