Original Title: "Semi-final AI Prediction Showdown: Is France Secure? England vs. Argentina Showdown in the Balance"
In the previous article about the World Cup quarterfinals prediction, 6 AIs unanimously favored France, Spain, England, and Argentina to advance. After the four matches, with four semifinal tickets punched, the AIs did not get a single prediction wrong.
France's advancement was the most straightforward. Despite Mbappé missing a penalty, he later scored a goal to help France eliminate Morocco 2-0. Spain once again staged a comeback victory, with Merino scoring in the 88th minute to defeat Belgium 2-1. The other two matches went into extra time: Sterling scored twice to help England come from behind to beat Norway 2-1; while Argentina, despite playing with one man down against Switzerland, scored two late goals in extra time to secure a hard-fought 3-1 victory.

Similarly, to participate more effectively in the semifinal prediction market, I once again consulted the 6 AIs—ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qianwen, and Grok—to predict the winner, scoreline, and whether the match would go into extra time or a penalty shootout.
However, in the semifinals, the 6 AIs' predictions showed significant discrepancies.
The first semifinal of this World Cup is France against Spain, with the match scheduled for July 15 at 3 a.m. Beijing time. Monitoring by the PPP prediction market tool shows that in the "World Cup Semifinal France vs. Spain" prediction event on predict.fun, the current probabilities are: France's win probability at 42%, draw at 30%, and Spain's win at 30%. Additionally, including extra time and penalties, France's advancement probability is 60%, and Spain's advancement probability is 40%.

These are the two most defensively solid teams in this World Cup. France has not conceded a goal since entering the knockout stage, while Spain's goal has only been breached once throughout the tournament. However, the two teams have completely different ways of winning. Spain relies on ball possession and high press in the frontcourt to control the rhythm, while France excels in quick transitions, using the speed and individual skills of their forwards to directly threaten.
Among the 6 AIs, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, and Qianwen all choose France to advance. Furthermore, the scoreline predicted by the 5 models is France 2-1 Spain. Although Spain may enjoy more possession, the significant forward push of their full-backs could leave space behind them vulnerable. Facing Mbappé, Dembélé, and Ollie, France does not need prolonged spells of possession; they just need to capitalize on a few transition opportunities to directly impact the game.
ChatGPT's analysis of the match process is more specific, predicting that France will score first through a counterattack, Spain will equalize in the second half, then continue to press forward, only to be caught on the break by France for a late winner. While Claude sees a chance for the game to go into extra time, ultimately, like Grok, DeepSeek, and 千问, they have chosen France to win 2-1 in regular time.
The only one siding with Spain is Gemini, forecasting a 1-1 draw after 120 minutes, with Spain advancing through a penalty shootout. Gemini's focus is not on Spain overpowering France in attack but on Spain's ability to maintain possession, reduce the number of attacking transitions in the match, and minimize France's lethal counterattacks.
As long as Spain does not concede early, they have a chance to set the pace to their liking. Despite France boasting stars like Mbappé and Dembélé, they might not find much space against Spain's midfield control. Similarly, with France not conceding a goal in the knockout stages, Spain will also find it challenging to break through in open play. Therefore, Gemini's analysis suggests that the match may stay low-scoring for an extended period, with both teams taking one chance each and holding the scoreline until a penalty shootout.
Hence, whether Gemini can be the sole AI to correctly predict Spain's advancement has also become another key point of interest in this match. In contrast, the disagreement in the other semifinal is much greater—England against Argentina, with none of the six AIs forming a consensus on the advancing team.
The second semifinal of this World Cup is England against Argentina, with the match scheduled for July 16 at 3:00 AM Beijing time. Market monitoring by the PPP prediction tool shows that according to predict.fun data, in regular time, England has a 37% chance of winning, a 33% chance of a draw, and Argentina has a 32% chance of winning. Additionally, including extra time and penalties, England's advancement probability is 55%, while Argentina's is 45%.

Compared to France and Spain, this match is more challenging to predict. Both teams played a full 120 minutes in the previous round. England overcame Norway in extra time, while Argentina only defeated Switzerland in the dying moments of extra time. Factors such as physical exertion, the form of key players, and the tempo of the game could all influence the final outcome.
As for the predictions by the six AI models, Grok, DeepSeek, and 千问 support England, while ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude are leaning towards Argentina.
Supporters of England value physicality, set pieces, and impactfulness. Grok and DeepSeek both predict a 2:1 victory for England in regular time, while Thousand Whys gives a more aggressive prediction of 2:0. England's current attack is highly focused on Kane and Bellingham. These two have scored the vast majority of the team's goals, with Bellingham stepping up to solve problems in two consecutive knockout rounds. In the view of these models, England can use high pressing, crosses, and set pieces to continue applying pressure and aim to finish the game within 90 minutes.
Argentinian supporters, on the other hand, put more emphasis on knockout stage experience. Gemini predicts a 2:1 regular time victory for Argentina, believing that Messi's playmaking and ability to score crucial goals are still sufficient to decide this level of match. Claude's assessment is more conservative, suggesting that both teams are likely to engage in a low-scoring tug of war, with a possibility of a 1:1 draw in regular time. The probability of the match going into extra time is significantly higher than the first game, with a final inclination towards Argentina progressing. ChatGPT goes as far as predicting the match going to a penalty shootout directly, with both teams drawing 1:1 in regular time. Neither team dares to press too high during extra time, and in the end, Argentina eliminates England with a score of 4:3, relying on Emiliano Martinez's skills and their more extensive penalty shootout experience.
In the previous round, AIs had a high degree of consensus in predicting the semifinals, all of which turned out to be correct. As we enter the semifinals, the prediction results have become one "consensus game" and one "divergence game." Can France break through Spain's possession-based system, and will England and Argentina battle to a penalty shootout? This time, whose predictions are more trustworthy?
Original Article Link
Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:
Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats
Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App
Official Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia