Source: OKX

From Investment Banking to Web3? Entering the scene in 2017, enjoying the "DeFi Summer" in 2020 only to unexpectedly discover the airdrop track? Achieving multiple multi-million results after just 4 years in the game?

How did the "Airdrop Master" FengMi @KuiGas achieve this? If you are also a DeFi enthusiast, this "Sunflower Sutra" is a must-read—

FengMi believes the core strategy of airdrop hunting lies in "losing Gas," that is, where does the Gas consumption go? Breaking it down, it boils down to two points: 1. Whether the consumed Gas increases weight, and 2. Whether the consumed Gas enhances on-chain identity.

This is an "OKX Friends" series interview aimed at exploring different background KOLs' career stories, industry insights, and lessons learned for beginner users to learn from. This interviewee for this edition is Mercy Mei @Mercy_okx. Welcome everyone to follow along~

Article Overview:

Chapter 1: Onboarding Experience: How did you get into DeFi and become an expert at airdrop hunting

Chapter 2: Core Strategy of Airdrop Hunting: How to select high-quality airdrop projects

Chapter 3: The Future of Airdrops

Chapter 4: Advice for Beginners: How to start airdrop hunting from scratch

Chapter 5: Suggestions for OKX

Chapter 1: Onboarding Experience: How did you get into DeFi and become an expert at airdrop hunting

1 What was the turning point for you to enter the crypto scene? Why is "DeFi Hunting" a "gold mine"?

I have a background in finance, specializing in securities investment and management. I have worked in traditional finance in hedge trading and investment banking. I entered the cryptocurrency scene in 2017 and during the DeFi Summer of 2020, I caught on to the airdrop track.

In fact, I knew about BTC in 2009, when it wasn't worth much. At that time, when it had just come out, I even mined it with a laptop, but I didn't understand the technology well and mainly had a low awareness and couldn't grasp the value of this thing, so I missed out. I really started to get involved during the 2017 bull market, attracted by the skyrocketing prices. I wanted to make big money; that was the purest initial motivation. After that, I gradually got into DeFi in 2018-2019, with protocols like MakerDAO, Compound, Uniswap, and others.

During the 2020 "DeFi Summer," I found that DeFi mining could be combined with airdrop farming, and the compounding effect was very significant!

It was during the Uni and Sushi token launches that I truly realized that "airdrop farming" was a viable strategy. So, I explored many protocols I was bullish on, including ENS and Paraswap. From that moment on, I heavily invested in multiple wallets. Subsequently, ENS and Paraswap conducted airdrops, with ENS airdrop rewards exceeding 100,000 CNY for single wallets and PSP starting at $10,000 for single wallets. This was also considered my first significant windfall in this space, validating that making money through airdrops was feasible—it felt like striking gold.

2. Why did you want to create and launch 33DAO, and what was your initial intention? What impact has it had on yourself since its establishment?

33DAO is a collaborative and sharing DAO organization, of which I am one of the founders. It has been running for 4 years now, with 35 individuals distributed globally. We must hold weekly meetings, and all members must attend. I quickly calculated that 33DAO has had no fewer than 200 weekly meetings in the past 4 years.

The initial intention was simple—to bring together a group of capable and innovative individuals to engage in regular communication, in-depth discussions, and idea exchanges to form a truly valuable community. Simultaneously, we have been continuously providing external outputs such as tutorials, market insights, Space discussions, etc., to help airdrop farmers get up to speed quickly and better understand Web3.

Regarding the impact on myself since its establishment, I feel there are three main points: First and foremost, I believe the most direct impact is that I have met a group of extraordinary individuals, and all of us have achieved significant results through this community. These members encourage and influence each other, enhancing our understanding and ultimately realizing gains. I think this is a very positive process.

For instance, during the recent New Year period, when the Trump token was released, within the first few minutes, a member shared information about it. Initially, many thought it was a scam, but through collaborative data analysis, the information was verified to be true. Subsequently, everyone quickly took positions, and I remember it was around $0.5-1. In about 2 days, it had increased by approximately 100x. In the end, many individuals obtained significant results. Unfortunately, I was overseas at that time, had bought too little, and regretted missing out! Additionally, I deeply understand the importance of a close-knit community and the significance of engaging with the right people.

Secondly, the existence of 33DAO compels me to continuously produce outputs. This implies a need to continue researching and sharing insights. Many insights are not innate but evolve through continuous learning, deep contemplation, and discussions with community members. This mechanism of self-driven growth has had a great impact on me. For example, many projects we once focused on, such as ARB, Strk, etc., the community members encouraged and exchanged information during bear markets, ultimately achieving very good results.

Finally, accumulation of resources and connections. 33DAO has given us the opportunity to directly engage with top overseas projects, many of which have been discovered through the community's efforts first-hand. Through many project exchanges, there is a broader perspective, and interaction among members enhances closeness, somewhat integrating grassroots into the Web3 ecosystem.

Chapter 2: The Core Strategy of Lurking Rabbit: How to Screen High-Quality Airdrop Projects

1., How do you screen high-quality airdrop projects? What are the key metrics you pay most attention to? (Such as team background, tokenomics, community activity, etc.)

Key metrics for screening high-quality projects: Sector, funding background, ecosystem layout, team background, on-chain data, technical innovation points, etc., as well as market capability, memeability, and coordination ability. When analyzing and screening projects, I personally focus on the project's risk-reward ratio, probability, and cost. I think this is a very complex process, and each step is a practical methodology I have summarized over many years.

1. Categorize Sectors, Focus on Mainstream

There are only a few major sectors or narratives, and with enough exposure, you can naturally distinguish between them. First, go through the mainstream sectors to establish a basic understanding, such as L1/L2, ZK DeFi, LSD, Restaking, BTCFi, Move language, etc. I usually rank projects within the ecosystem and then analyze the risk-reward ratio and probability separately.

2. Look for Highlights and Protocol Technological Innovations/Features.

After consuming a lot of content, I focus on what the core advantages of the project are. How is it different from competitors in the same sector? If time allows, you can read the whitepaper and official documentation, but initially, it's advisable to first grasp the sector and quickly understand what a project is about before delving deeper. A project that left a deep impression on me is Maverick, ... on ZkSync, high APR, found a huge opportunity.

3. Focus on Institutions and Investors from a Multidimensional Perspective

Having institutional support increases credibility, especially star-studded projects are less likely to rug pull, making it easier to aim for moonshots with higher ceilings. Institutional financing + investors, VC perspective. With institutions already vetting the project, it can effectively filter out ordinary projects, improving success rates. I personally prefer to keep an eye on institutions I admire, such as Hack VC.

Core Idea: First look at the sector, quickly judge the positioning, then look at the project's highlights, and finally observe institutional investments, looking for the project's alpha, analyze the project's marketing strategy, especially with a project-centric perspective. Explore from multiple angles and dimensions.

I have turned this process into a real blind date self-introduction process. What do you do, what does your whole family do, do you have money, do you have a house, do you have a car, do you have a job, do you have... In short, why I should get involved in this project needs to be very clear.

2. The project team usually identifies Sybil attacks through technical means. In a situation where you are not identified as a "Sybil attack," how do you reasonably use a multi-account strategy?

This is a good question. Due to time constraints, I will try to cover it comprehensively.

1. First, what is a Sybil attack: An individual or group creates a large number of accounts to manipulate the network and protocol's resource allocation through fake behavior. It involves typical bulk operations, programmatic operations, robot operations, etc.

2. What the project team thinks and does: The project team and the ecosystem hope for real users to participate in the network, and they also want to reward real users. The project team will use on-chain data analysis, address correlation, behavior pattern detection, and other technical means to identify this activity. A typical example is Nansen's AI cluster analysis.

3. The essence of a Sybil attack: Using multiple accounts does not necessarily mean a Sybil attack. Rather, creating a large number of non-contributing spam accounts to abuse the rules and obtain airdrops is considered a Sybil attack. The core of the project team's identification of Sybil activity is "de-scripting and de-batching."

4. Answer to your question: How to reasonably use a multi-account strategy?

My viewpoint is: Create "premium accounts." Premium accounts mean that each account is "independent + genuine." Classic examples like Pengu from some time ago and Tia from the past illustrate this concept, with an account holding between $500 and $2000. Premium accounts mean high-quality accounts, each with genuine user on-chain records, independent behavior, and reasonable on-chain asset distribution. Multiple accounts adhere to the principle of risk diversification. Having multiple accounts does not equal a Sybil attack. Using a multi-account strategy is just a rule of probability, a principle of broad coverage. The odds of a single account's earnings might not be as high as the cumulative returns from multiple accounts.

Specific practices:

Initial Stage - Basic Principles:

1. Reasonable fund circulation. Implement differentiation from the beginning, including fund sources.

2. Rational fund flow without concentration of deposits and withdrawals.

3. Randomize interaction time and amount, avoiding mechanical operations.

4. Multi-chain layout to make the accounts appear more natural with traces of real users.

Account Farming Interaction Phase:

1. No batch operation, each account has independent behavior

2. Interaction timing, avoid assembly line operation, such as randomizing amount during interaction, transaction order, combining multiple types of protocols

3. Multi-chain layout, making the account more natural, and keeping the interaction paths as independent as possible

4. Create high-quality user profiles and behaviors, holding different assets to increase account weight

5. Participate in real activities to increase account weight. Such as DAO voting, NFT Minting, DeFi Staking

6. Combined interactions, embedded interactions, integrating DeFi strategies, focusing on optimizing Gas consumption

3. How to Understand "Premium Account"?

A premium account refers to a high-quality account, with each account having the on-chain records of a real user, independent behavior, and a reasonable distribution of on-chain assets. Of course, everyone's understanding of a premium account may vary. Project teams distributing rewards also hope to have real and high-quality addresses. Some address rewards are for their own project's equity-type NFT, while others focus on on-chain interaction profiles. Many key points of focus will be funds, activity level, diversity, on-chain identity, loyalty, mainnet data (gas consumption, time, transactions, activity time), holding NFTs, etc. Be as genuine as possible.

Key Focus Areas: Wallet History, Interaction Behavior, Fund Flow, Asset Holding (tokens, NFTs), Balance Retention, Multi-chain Activity, Partial Social Bindings...

4. How to Control the Cost of Interaction? On a High Gas Fee Chain (such as Ethereum), What are Your Suggestions for Optimizing Interaction Strategies?

1. Personally, I don't use various buzzwords such as IP, ADS, and other programmatic jargon that many people mention, mainly because I don't know how to use them. I focus more on the on-chain profile formed by the gas spending of the account itself.

2. The cost of interacting with accounts for me is: capital cost and gas cost.

3. So, the core points I care about are where Gas consumption is happening, either by increasing weight or enhancing the on-chain profile. These two points are the most critical in targeting a project team's airdrop perspective.

4. In terms of specific strategies, it is to maximize through DeFi, arbitrage, trading, minting, or project-centric weight transactions. Reclaim the lost gas cost as much as possible, while improving and enhancing the account profile. This process has a very significant reflexivity. You have to learn to lose money and gas first.

5. When facing high Gas fees on the blockchain (such as Ethereum) as you mentioned, what optimization strategies do you recommend for on-chain interactions? The situation may vary, as in the past few years, only the first year had high Gas fees, while fees have been low afterward. For example, currently with low Gas fees, it is a good opportunity to refine new strategies. You can take this opportunity to interact with mainnet data alongside a specific project.

5. Different projects have varying interaction requirements. How do you adjust your strategy based on each project's characteristics?

Each project has different requirements for airdrop interactions, and blindly following tutorials is not as useful anymore. Everyone hopes to achieve precise interactions with minimal cost and maximum rewards. This is extremely challenging, as this uncertainty and reflexivity require long-term practice and monitoring. This is also the most challenging aspect of this track.

1. My strategy has always been to use high-quality accounts, weighted interactions, calculate high ROI, and manage risks. I aim to sniper high-quality protocols by combining transaction protocols. Different projects have different airdrop distribution logics, so a blanket approach won't work. My experience shows that success is not simply about quantity but about finding the correct interaction strategy that aligns with the project's goals and matches my own personality.

2. For example, regarding L1/L2 solutions, one must consider TVL, authenticity, prefer native DApps, and a diverse combination. Have a realistic perspective on playing with the ecosystem.

For DeFi protocols, it is crucial to focus on deep users from the project's perspective, prioritizing users who provide long-term liquidity and trading, considering factors such as deposit times, amounts, LP, etc. Specific analysis based on on-chain data of individual protocols is key.

When it comes to cross-chain bridges, especially in staking protocols, the focus should align with protocol backgrounds, emphasizing TGE time, security, industry positioning, and ROI.

Examples of EigenLayer and Babylon.

Furthermore, interactions can also enhance the quality and weight of an account. I can elaborate on my logic behind participating in W Wormhole – for earnings exceeding $10,000, if anyone is interested, I can share more details privately.

For community-based projects, encouraging contributions, especially those with NFT-related gameplay, one should focus on the ecosystem NFT and hold equity-type OG NFTs.

"Quality beats quantity" is more important than "quantity" itself, especially as the current market increasingly values genuine users. Therefore, precise interaction, reasonable fund allocation, and long-term account nurturing are the current key focuses. In the current airdrop arena, success is not about the number of wallets but about researching the project, understanding the rules, and executing effectively!

6 How do you judge the timing of selling after many projects do airdrops and everyone chooses to sell the received tokens?

This is something I didn't do well. Now I'm holding a bunch of shitcoins. I'm the typical representative who knows how to hodl but not how to sell. I think there are many reasons for this. On the one hand, the market has changed. In the previous cycle, holders got rich overnight, but this time, hodling leads to losses. I held OP and ARB for over a year in the past. Some projects I hold then go to stake, drop by 90%, and there are many cases where a large sum becomes a small sum. Some projects that airdrop, I really haven't sold yet, like EigenLayer. If I really encounter a project that has dropped drastically, I will play dead and wait for it to go to zero, include the listing price as the cost price, and recognize the loss. I have always not pursued absolute value but pursued a mentality of relative value.

After suffering a lot of losses, based on my personal situation, at the current stage, after receiving an airdrop, I will probably sell about 1/3. Subsequently, based on the project and market conditions, most of the projects I got are VC coins. My main focus is on the project's final valuation, listing market cap, unlock situation, and most importantly, the market situation. In fact, we cannot be used as a reference. The main reason for not wanting to sell is that being able to get free airdrops creates an emotional attachment!

Chapter 3: The Future of Airdrops

1 How do you view the emergence of Pump and other meme launch platforms, and what kind of impact will this have on rug pulling?

Platforms like Pump.fun have lowered the token issuance threshold, allowing anyone to issue tokens in seconds using a one-click issuance model, automatically create LP, essentially evolving into a new, extremely liberal asset issuance model. Its emergence is equivalent to transitioning from the early ICO, IEO model to the airdrop model, and evolving to the current self-issuance model. It reduces the issuance threshold of tokens and also changes the mindset and strategy of Web3 participants (especially rug pullers).

1. Impact on token distribution

This liberal asset issuance model lowers the token issuance threshold, one-click issuance + automatic LP creation, no technical knowledge required, no need for funding, directly entering the market. This new model not only affects the meme track but also brings changes to the traditional Web3 project token distribution method. Many projects choose not to list on exchanges first and directly list on DEX. Project teams no longer need to rely on traditional funding or token lockups but instead let the market determine the token's value.

2. Impact on Lollipop Sir

Impact 1 - Mindset: The lollipop cycle has been greatly shortened, posing a huge test to human nature. Speculative mindset is intensified. Previously, in lollipop airdrops, everyone was accustomed to a 3-24 month interaction period, waiting long term for TGE. Now with Pump meme coins, the price can skyrocket by a hundredfold in a few minutes, or drop back to zero just as quickly. Compared to meme coins, lollipopping involves uncertain returns, anti-lollipop, and various characteristics, offering no excitement.

Impact 2 - Interest: The "belief system" of Lollipop Sir collapses, and speculative gameplay is magnified infinitely. In the past, lollipoppers focused on interaction depth, on-chain contributions, technical characteristics, and value in lollipop airdrops, with the hope that the Sir would project develop long term. In meme mode, the core driving force of the token is "emotion + narrative + FOMO capital." Many lollypopers no longer focus on airdrops but turn to memes, no longer caring about the project itself, only concerned with short-term fluctuations because it's more exciting, faster, and has a wealth effect. Everyone hopes to be the child of versions.

Impact 3 - Gambling: Lollipop Sirs' mindset is even more FOMO, easily falling into gambling, whereas traditional lollipop focused on stable and steady growth. However, the meme ecosystem has pushed the market into an extreme speculative mode, intensifying the gambling nature.

2. Future Trends in Lollipopping: Does multi-address Gas loss still have an opportunity?

I believe it does. You can never get rich with just one address; there cannot be excess returns. However, there needs to be a balance between personal funds and account circulation and distribution. While multi-address gas loss is possible, do not burn gas. There is a distinction here. The core of future lollipopping is the "boutique address," with genuine interaction, natural capital flow, and long-term activity being the optimal strategy. Lollipopping is no longer just about "quantity stacking" but rather a test of "strategy + execution + information asymmetry"! Those with strong execution capabilities can still stack boutique addresses and more.

3. For projects that require both Gas burning and social account tasks, how should this be handled?

Some projects have a dual screening mechanism in their activity design, requiring both on-chain interaction (Gas burning) and social engagement (Twitter, Discord, Galxe tasks, etc.). This model imposes higher demands on loss friends. If not handled properly, you may invest too much cost and time, with the final returns not matching up. My advice and strategy are:

1. First, evaluate whether the project is worth "both Gas burning and social interaction." Before that, you must have your own logical judgment and thinking, see if the project aligns with your personality, and develop a differentiated interaction strategy.

2. Here we differentiate between studios and individuals, and the strategies here should be different. As a super individual, personally, I have nurtured a set of 3 accounts, all of which were registered one by one with early overseas mobile phones. These are accounts that have been nurtured for a long time and are within my personal capacity. They are nurtured separately on different computers. Nurturing a set of 3 depends more on your behavior. Occasionally, you need to show differential activity. The set of 3 will also be checked for correlations, activity levels, and account quality. Due to time constraints, I won't say much. Anyway, this is infrastructure, it must exist, but it is not in high demand.

3. Corresponding to the high-quality account mentioned in point 1, you can set up a set of 3 accounts, managing a number of accounts within your personal capacity. For example, 100 accounts.

4. More focus on on-chain profiles and high-quality transactions. Abandoning many meaningless web3 interactive tasks, the key here is to assess the activities designed by the project team.

4. Will TX be useful, and what is the role of transaction volume in rug pulls? Is it still effective?

With the continuous upgrading of the project team's selection criteria and anti-whale mechanisms, this simple and crude accounting method is no longer the best strategy. Rug pulls now emphasize more on "interaction quality + transaction authenticity." However, TX and transaction volume need to be combined with "interaction depth." To give an inappropriate analogy, if you used to visit the bank frequently, the bank manager might recognize you, and occasionally invite you for a coffee. At this stage, just making deposits may not be useful; you need to be a VIP, a long-term customer who buys their financial products and insurance products through them.

5. What kind of innovative airdrop design in the future can benefit the community, the project team, and the entire ecosystem?

This topic is quite broad and extensive. How to execute a successful airdrop strategy is an art for the project team; a misstep can turn into a disaster. Let me briefly explain my understanding:

1. Airdrops have been proven to be a critical way for Web3 projects to grow early on and acquire users. However, the traditional airdrop model indeed has many problems, leading to projects giving out a large number of tokens but failing to attract long-term users. The proportion of "low-quality users" is too high, damaging the tokenomics model...

2. A good airdrop is designed to attract new users, reward early users, retain more users, and drive growth around the project and ecosystem's economic flywheel. More innovative, fairer, and sustainable airdrop designs should achieve a "win-win-win" situation for the project team, community users, and the ecosystem.

Future airdrop models and methods must adhere to the following core principles:

1- Long-term incentive mechanism (avoiding short-term selling, encouraging users to continue interacting and contributing in the long term)

2- Combine on-chain data with off-chain community contributions to screen for real users and genuine contributors

3-3 Win-Win Situation (User Growth = Ecosystem Growth)

4- Public Transparency (Clearly explain each rule and its rationale), don't engage in insider trading

There are various specific methods, for example: the "gradual release" mechanism, inspired by OP's airdrop, conducting multiple rounds of airdrops, providing comprehensive and continuous rewards for long-term contributions. Additionally, more elements can be added on top of this foundation to enhance the airdrop strategy and design. There is no perfect solution, only the effort to accommodate retail investors and more genuine users as much as possible.

Chapter Four: Advice for Beginners

1、How to Start from Scratch in DeFi, for beginners who are just starting to explore DeFi, with a starting capital of a few hundred U, how should they get started?

DeFi exploration is a low-cost way to enter Web3 and make some gains, but it is not a simple game of free money. It should be a combination of awareness, strategy, and execution capability. Different people have different interaction strategies and tactics at different stages, and there are differences between those with technical backgrounds and those without. For newcomers who are just starting out and are not tech-savvy, here is my advice:

1. Conceptually: Correct Awareness

• Learning: Understand some ways to make money in the industry, the airdrop model, explore the ecosystem and protocols, and identify projects that suit you in the early stages

· Principles: After making your own project judgment, be clear that not all projects are worth exploring. Before exploring, have selection criteria. The essence of DeFi exploration is "low-cost investment," and your "investment" includes time, gas fees, and opportunity costs. Avoid FOMO.

• Direction: Choose the right track; direction is more important than effort. In DeFi exploration, choose a track with high future certainty, a large amount of capital, and potential long-term incentives

• Research: Build a project database, learn how to analyze projects, track projects, calculate ROI, identify risks, loss points, weighting points, etc.

2. Practically: Specific Methods

• Learn the correct way to interact: Such as how to swap, provide liquidity, find tokens, complete project tasks using a 3-piece set, etc. The core is to improve interaction skills.

• Increase Account Weight: Learn to engage deeply, become an active, authentic, high-quality user in the ecosystem protocol.

• Cost Control: There are many ways to control costs, not only through staking and Kuigas, but also by participating in high-quality testnet projects available in the market.

• Multi-angle Participation: For example, from a user's perspective, deep engagement in the ecosystem, from a creator's perspective, helping the project create content, and so on.

Summary: From slow to fast, less is more.

2. Common Misconceptions?

Abundance: Sometimes it's a blessing in disguise; some pitfalls must be experienced firsthand, and the most useful reflection comes from self-experience. Teaching someone doesn't make them understand, but experiencing it once makes them learn.

3. How Should Beginners Access High-Quality Information Sources? Do You Have Any Recommended Information Channels or Tools?

A simple way is to follow high-quality KOLs on platforms such as Twitter, YouTube, etc. You can find projects from RootData @RootDataCrypto, locate the corresponding X account and team members, as well as funding information.

For learning, OKX's web3 wallet @OKXWeb3_CN also offers many basic project tasks that can be used for practice.

Chapter Five: Recommendations for OKX

1. What Role and Influence Has OKX Played in the Development of Various Ecosystems?

OKX's wallet supports a particularly large number of ecosystems and chains. As far as I know, it currently supports 127 chains. Personally, I use OKX as my go-to wallet in the interactive wallet. I usually share the same set of mnemonic words with both OKX and MetaMask.

Features: Secure, timely, smooth—there are too many to list. Anyway, it's user-friendly. The Movement ecosystem owes a lot to OKXWeb3 wallet support. At that time, to use Movement, we needed to download another wallet, but it wasn't user-friendly. After I raised this issue with Haiteng @Haiteng_okx, he immediately connected me with relevant colleagues who promptly supported Movement. This made things a lot easier for us, as we no longer needed to keep migrating assets back and forth.

2. In future development, what ecosystem collaborations would you like to see with OKX? In what form? What kind of partnerships does the community want to see?

The ecosystem is very comprehensive, and as far as I know, OKX's wallet team is very capable, and their BD expansion is also very strong, with rapid support and timely bug fixes. I think there may be room for improvement in the airdrop interaction aspect. OKX @okxchinese has done well broadly, but the depth is lacking. Many users use OKX, and here, valuable growth systems can be built around the user's wallet situation, which can collaborate with many ecosystems, helping both parties attract traffic or provide OKX wallet users with more data benefits and rewards.

Regarding tools, they have already done very well. For example, recently they supported real-time K-line on X and one-click token swap. In terms of airdrops, OKX can act as an airdrop detector so that users can detect any unclaimed airdrops in their on-chain wallets.

Closing:

Fengmi: The experience of these 5 years has strengthened my belief that true value lies not in what you know, but in what you can connect and execute.

In this ever-changing market, the strongest competitiveness comes from continuously evolving cognition, forward-looking layout, and damn good execution. Time is short, so please correct me if I am wrong!

Mercy: When I first heard of Teacher Fengmi, he seemed like a legendary figure. Some even said Teacher Feng spends all 365 days a year meditating in the temple to claim airdrops... After truly getting in touch, I found that whether it's his sincere and humble way of doing things or his focused and dedicated professionalism, both are worthy of Mercy's learning and respect.

In this conversation among friends of OKX about the "Dao and Art" of airdrops, Mercy has gained three key points:

1. To have outstanding judgment—the quality of the airdrop is more important than the quantity;

2. A high sense of responsibility—treat every deal seriously;

3. Strong execution—the newcomers and the old alike need it.

Hopefully, everyone can also benefit. Once again, thank you to Fengmi for sharing. Stay tuned for more from the "Friends of OKX" conversation series.

Risk Warning and Disclaimer

This article is for reference only. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not represent the official position of OKX. This article is not intended to provide (i) investment advice or investment recommendations; (ii) an offer or solicitation to buy, sell, or hold digital assets; or (iii) financial, accounting, legal, or tax advice. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of such information. Holding digital assets (including stablecoins and NFTs) involves high risks and may experience significant volatility. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you based on your financial situation. For your specific circumstances, please consult your legal/tax/investment professional. You are responsible for understanding and complying with local applicable laws and regulations.

This article is contributed content and does not represent the views of BlockBeats.

Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:

Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Official Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia