The Internet returns to the historical fork in the road

Original author: 0xclancularius, Rhythm BlockBeats

In 2007, Jobs released the first touch-screen mobile phone—iPhone, which subverted the rules of the Internet industry.

In 2008, inspired by the global financial crisis, Satoshi Nakamoto released the Bitcoin white paper, creating a new electronic currency - Bitcoin.

At that time, Jobs probably did not expect that the change of the iPhone to the Internet industry directly triggered the golden decade of the closed development of Web2 mobile Internet.

At that time, Satoshi Nakamoto probably couldn’t have imagined that more than ten years later, when the possibilities of Web2 were exhausted, Bitcoin and Blockchain will be the key to open the door of Web3.

After more than ten years of development of the mobile Internet, it seems to be at the end of the road. Talking about the monopoly and closure of large companies has become a kind of political correctness. Under the brutal conquest of Internet giants, the walls of big factories are getting higher and higher, and the data ownership and privacy rights of ordinary users are at risk. When the traffic dividend disappeared and the growth slowed down, I thought that the Internet industry was only left with the stock game, but Web3 gave the industry new hope, and people began to yearn for a new Internet future.

In this new future, users will own the platform, not the platform owns the users. Users' time, attention, and data are no longer commodities sold by the platform, and the ownership of content and data returns to users. The interests of shareholders are not the first priority. Web3 applications are jointly created and owned by the community. The most important thing is that the Internet will no longer be closed, and open source and openness will become the consensus of Web3, which will lead to more innovative possibilities.

People who are familiar with the history of Internet development may say here: Wait a minute, isn’t open source and openness a feature of the early Internet? The river of history twists and turns, does it go back to the past?

It is said that "people cannot step into the same river", but the Internet seems to be tracing its own source, returning to the fork in the past of Web2, standing at the Start again in the river of history.

Simply, we will re-walk the road of the Internet from the dimension of openness and closure.

The once open Web2

In "traffic is king", spending money is In China’s Internet industry, which is the main growth mode, Xindong Technology CEO Huang Yimeng has successfully cultivated such an excellent game distribution and content platform as TapTap in the gaps between Tencent, NetEase, Station B and other game giants. Without his in-depth understanding of the open community.

Before Xindong, Huang Yimeng founded VeryCD in 2003, which is the Chinese version of eMule, a P2P media resource sharing website based on open source. At that time, the concept of VeryCD was "Sharing the Internet". It wanted to build the world's largest, most convenient, and most user-friendly resource sharing network through open technology, and it really became one of the most visited resource sharing websites in mainland China.

In the Chinese Internet at that time, Huang Yimeng was not the only entrepreneur who believed in the concept of openness. Recently, Huang Yimeng was nostalgic on Twitter, reminiscing about discussing with Ah Bei (Douban founder Yang Bo) and Mtime founder Ma Ruila for more than ten years, how to get through the movie data open agreement of Douban, VeryCD and Mtime.

Huang Yimeng’s memories are not without sentimentality, “It was the golden age of Web2.0, and everyone believed that openness was a matter of course, and each website performed its duties Piecing together a richer Internet.”

Huang Yimeng Twitter

Indeed, Web2 used to be an open paradise. The most typical representative is the RSS protocol that was once in vogue.

RSS is a web aggregator protocol that allows users to access updates from websites in a standardized, computer-readable format. Subscribing to RSS allows users to keep track of updates from many different websites in one news aggregator without having to open and check each one. Translated into adult words, users who use RSS can customize their own content information flow.

At that time, the Internet industry was still in its early days, and now common large-scale applications such as Facebook, Twitter, and Weibo had not yet been born, and people used RSS to track the content of different websites Update and customize your favorite stream. As Huang Yimeng said, ten years ago, APIs, RSS, and XML exports that did not require login registration were standard configurations for many websites.

However, with the development of the mobile Internet, various App applications have emerged. Users only need to register an account, and the App will provide us with corresponding information. We no longer need to customize our own information flow, the APP will "continuously push" according to our browsing preferences. At present, our commonly used content applications such as WeChat official account and Toutiao are actually closed services based on RSS. Correspondingly, excellent RSS providers such as Google Reader and feedsky have been shut down one after another, and the number of websites that support RSS is also decreasing. This agreement seems to be becoming dust of history.

Even mobile apps have had an open era. In the early days, Weibo started to build an open platform and provided API interfaces for third-party developers to build personalized client products, thus giving birth to a batch of third-party Weibo clients with strong personalization and fewer advertisements. Welcomed by users. However, Weibo, who is unwilling to see the development of third-party clients, has successively closed basic permissions for reasons such as security issues. Until 2017, some developers revealed that Weibo had completely closed the open interface, which meant that the third-party clients were almost wiped out, and Weibo was closed again.

Another popular open product is the 2011 app IFTTT, which stands for If This Then That in English. As the name suggests, you can set a condition on IFTTT to have the system perform a specific action for you.

As an open collection of a bunch of websites, IFTTT allows users to only need to select one of the third-party services it provides, and specify when it appears in a certain state , which triggers an action in another service. Everything can be done with a snap of your fingers. For example, you can set IFTTT to send you a tweet when the weather changes to rain; you can set IFTTT to send the mention of you to Evernote when it finds out that someone mentions you on Twitter; Set IFTTT to send the updated content to Read It Later when an RSS feed is updated.

In the early days of Web2 development, this kind of open thinking allowed the innovation of different products to be combined and superimposed like Lego. On the basis of information aggregation and mutual inspiration, emerging More incredible compound interest effects.

However, between openness and closure, history has finally made its own choice.

Now we look back, with the birth of Apple's application system and the development of the mobile Internet, a large number of Web2 protocols that once moved towards open source and openness have been defeated in the competition. Instead, Internet applications that focus on moats, intellectual property rights, and monopoly are becoming more and more courageous. Under such a path, Web2 naturally began to turn, from open to closed, and then developed into the monopoly giant we are familiar with today.

Perhaps, a16z founder Marc Andreessen's famous saying "software is swallowing everything" is the best footnote to Web2.

The Dilemma of Openness and Commercialization

Openness and open source are obviously conducive to innovation, so why? Abandoned by history. This is inseparable from a classic problem in the development of Web2, how to make money?

The biggest profit logic of Web2 is "traffic realization".

Since Yahoo, the originator of Internet companies, opened the free service "Haotou", "burning money to earn traffic" and "traffic realization" have become the The problem facing all Internet companies.

How to obtain traffic (strategic choice) and traffic monetization efficiency (business model) can greatly affect the profitability and market value performance of Internet companies.

This point can be fully reflected in the development history of Tencent's early business model. Tencent's earliest product was to provide users with free instant messaging tools. Although the number of users has grown rapidly, users do not have the habit of paying, and Tencent did not have a good way to realize it at the time.

In order to achieve profitability, Tencent first charges through three modes of telecom value-added services, virtual commodity sales (QQ skin, etc.) and "Freemium" (Free + Premium). Subsequently, other free products and content were continuously expanded, such as WeChat, QQ Music, QQ Portal, QQ Games, etc., and then through value-added services, advertising, entertainment and e-commerce, etc., the attempt to "monetize traffic" was continuously expanded.

In the face of such business logic, the number of users and the duration of use are the biggest reservoirs of every Internet company, and applications need to be monetized around users. This also forces Internet applications to think of various ways to keep users in their own closed ecosystem, even at the expense of shielding and monopolizing each other, and there are giants such as Ali, Tencent, and Byte that we are familiar with. wars of all kinds.

Under the Web2 mechanism, openness and open source are exactly the opposite of profit.

When the RSS service is prevalent, it means that the traffic of a large number of websites has actually been stolen. Users can directly track website updates through RSS subscriptions, which is equivalent to cutting off these websites and application traffic, website content producers cannot obtain click-through rate and traffic, so they cannot monetize through advertising and other forms.

When Weibo opens the API to third-party developers, it means that the traffic of its main website is also shared, and the traffic and click-through rate of Weibo's own products Naturally it goes down. In the Web2 era where "traffic is king", what is shared is not just traffic, but business value and monetization opportunities. This model will certainly not last long for Weibo, a listed company.

For another example, in the traditional Internet, TCP/IP, HTTP, SMTP and other open protocols that establish the cornerstone of the Internet are obviously of high value, but their invention However, it is difficult for those who don’t have a way to realize it, unable to match the value that matches the contribution, and often can only “generate electricity with love”.

All historical choices are inseparable from the nature of human beings to pursue interests. This has no moral color, but an unchangeable fact.

In order to make a profit, Google keeps killing unmonetized apps, no matter how popular they are, including Google Reader, which uses RSS.

In order to make a profit, Tencent kills the applications built on its own ecology. A few lines of code can cut off the lifeline of a small program application, no matter how successful it is, Only because it poses a threat to its own business.

In order to make a profit, the Internet giants regard the entrance of user traffic as a golden door, blocking each other, no matter how much inconvenience this causes to users.

Until the end, when there is a conflict between user interests and commercial interests, Internet applications will still choose interests, after all, they only need to be responsible to shareholders and themselves.

Under the ultimate goal of commercial profit, traffic is getting more and more expensive, and Internet applications are becoming more and more closed and monopolized. They have to leave "buy road money", and then evolved into the behemoth of the Web2 era that we are familiar with now.

Web3: Incentive Mechanism Change

To change the model dilemma of Web2, it is necessary to change Business incentives.

Thanks to Satoshi Nakamoto, the concept of Bitcoin proposed more than ten years ago has finally subverted the enterprise business model and social collaboration model under the layer-by-layer evolution.

As the "fat protocol" theory says, the previous generation of shared protocols (TCP/IP, HTTP, SMTP, etc.) Most of it is at the application layer, retrieved as data (think Google, Facebook, etc.).

The key elements that Web3 will subvert this ecology are the shared data layer and the introduction of encrypted tokens.

By storing user data through an open source and decentralized network, rather than independent application access to control different information islands, Web3 reduces the entry of new participants Threshold, so that innovative ideas can be built layer by layer like Lego, and create an ecosystem: the products and services above will be more dynamic and competitive. On the same and open source protocol, the marketplace can build several competing, non-cooperative, but interoperable services. This also prevents a “winner takes all” market monopoly.

On the other hand, after the introduction of the token, when the token appreciates, it will attract early speculators, developers and entrepreneurs. They become stakeholders in the protocol and financially support its success. Then, some holders who have obtained early benefits will create applications and services around the protocol in order to further enhance the value of the token, and continue to grow the protocol ecosystem. Some applications will become very successful and introduce more new users, which will further increase the value of Toekn, attract more entrepreneurs' attention, and bring more applications, thus forming a positive cycle growth mechanism.

Under the dual functions of openness and token, it not only ensures the security, privacy and control of user data, but is owned by the user himself. The interests of protocols, applications, developers, and users are also closely related to each other. Everyone becomes an important participant in the entire interest cycle system. Everyone can be an architect, participate in the construction of the Web3 platform, and obtain and work through smart contracts. Proportional incentives. Everyone owns a platform.

The predicament that opening up and monetization cannot have both in the Web2 era will be completely broken. Although Web3 is currently still more discussed than implemented, it provides a better solution and a way forward in the predicament. After the development of the Internet hit the south wall, with the help of technological innovation, it returned to the once forked intersection, and continued to move forward along the path of openness and innovation of the predecessors.

From openness to closure of Web2 to the opening of Web3, there is quite an evolutionary conception of "seeing mountains as mountains and seeing water as water".

The historical course of this river seems to have taken a detour, but it is also the only way. At every moment, each market participant has made a choice to maximize his own interests, and the course of history is carved by interests. The birth of Bitcoin and the decentralized blockchain released power from the hands of a few people and distributed it to a wider group of people. The final choice of history must also be in the interests of power owners, that is, each of us.

Welcome to join the official BlockBeats community:

Telegram Subscription Group: https://t.me/theblockbeats

Telegram Discussion Group: https://t.me/BlockBeats_App

Official Twitter Account: https://twitter.com/BlockBeatsAsia