header-langage
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Tiếng Việt
한국어
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Türkçe
Scan to Download the APP

Peter Thiel's Secret Society Dark Rating Exposed: Bigshots Ranked in Three Six Nine Tiers, C-Level on Top, A-Level at the Bottom, Price Discounted Based on Popularity

According to the Beating Monitor, an analysis of the latest leaked data by WIRED revealed that the mysterious society Dialog, co-founded by Peter Thiel, has an extremely ruthless and biased "Ranking and Elimination" mechanism internally.

Dialog operates under the secretive rule of "Rank upon Entry." Despite having thousands of members, the leak reviewed by WIRED this time only included 192 individual profiles from inside the club (comprising 130 formal members and some candidates). These profiles displayed the club's counterintuitive hierarchy: C-tier being the highest VIP, B-tier constituting the majority of the common layer, and the supposedly elite A-tier actually being the least known bottom layer.

This ranking system is directly linked to members' wallets. Only about 25% of VIP "C" tycoons are required to pay the full event fee, while among the bottom "A" tier members, the proportion of those paying tens of thousands of dollars in full event fees goes up to 70%.

Interestingly, Dialog introduced an AI filtering mechanism that blindly believes in the so-called "national fame." For instance, "Thanos" actor Josh Brolin has never attended but secured a VIP "C" spot directly due to his box office earnings and millions of fans; meanwhile, academic giant Tyler Cowen was almost relegated to the common layer by AI for being deemed "not famous enough among regular people" and only managed to barely rise to the C-tier through manual intervention.

The "Value-Added Score" acts as a scythe to weed out the "useless." It specifically evaluates members' resource integration and intellectual contributions to other club titans. After each gathering, employees review member performance akin to "code reviews"; those with low value-added scores, cultural mismatches, or declining influence are ruthlessly removed from the invitation list.

Furthermore, the leaked database also exposed its built-in social and dating matching system (with 10% of members joining the singles pool), where the algorithm not only recommends matches but also maintains a "No-Match List."

This supposedly objective evaluation system is also rife with biases: while women make up a third of the membership, they only hold 18% of VIP seats; there is a more distinct differentiation based on political stances, as despite over half of members claiming to be "left-leaning," the probability of "right-wing" individuals securing a VIP spot is more than double that of left-leaning members. There are even instances where the "left-leaning" label of environmental advocates was forcefully edited backstage by employees to show "right-wing."

举报 Correction/Report
Correction/Report
Submit
Add Library
Visible to myself only
Public
Save
Choose Library
Add Library
Cancel
Finish