According to Pertinax Beating monitoring, in Episode 274 of the top tech and investment podcast All-In Podcast, the guests directly compared the current AI competition to the aftermath of World War II's Manhattan Project. After the end of World War II and the Soviet Union obtained nuclear secrets, nuclear proliferation entered an irreversible game theory track. At that time, a group of scientists leaked the secrets out of concern for preventing unilateral hegemony, leading to a balance of power between nuclear nations through nuclear deterrence. Current cutting-edge AI development is in a similar period of proliferation. If the United States were to forcibly slow down model development due to government regulation, tax restrictions, or security reviews, the asymmetrical balance of power would be disrupted, allowing other countries to quickly surpass, plunging the world into an extremely dangerous imbalance.
Under the current game theory logic, forced deceleration is impractical both in engineering and geopolitics. Once large-scale model technology starts to proliferate, it faces a stalemate akin to the hydrogen bomb arms race in the latter half of the Cold War era. Only by achieving equivalent technological capabilities can both sides return to the negotiating table. The leading large-scale models between China and the U.S. currently maintain a slight technological gap of less than 9 months, which objectively becomes a foundational driving force for both parties to seek moderation and avoid the Thucydides Trap.
If control of cutting-edge technology is ceded to the government, an irreversible one-way authoritarian trap will be formed. Utilizing traditional judicial systems and product liability lawsuits (such as personal injury or wrongful death) for post-event accountability is a more flexible technological constraint mechanism than pre-event review. In the deterministic track of great power rivalry, maintaining an absolute development speed and equilibrium is the optimal solution to prevent conflict and seek technological abundance.
