SlowMist: Distrust OpenClaw Stability, Some Fork Versions Have Poor Security Activeness

BlockBeats News, March 8th, SlowMist founder He Xuan posted on the X platform, stating: "Those who do not trust the stability or robustness of OpenClaw, but trust the Claude Code, which is one of the core goals of software engineering. In terms of security, both parties attach great importance to security, and the submitted vulnerabilities have received timely feedback. Some OpenClaw forks or reference versions lack the same level of security enthusiasm."

In terms of security scenarios, although OpenClaw also has a Sandbox mechanism and attempts to design more fine-grained tool permissions, but as its name suggests, 'OpenClaw,' openness is its greatest charm. A restricted OpenClaw is not truly OpenClaw. We want it to be free, yet we want it to be controllable. This is a dilemma for everyone, but in a real production environment, an excessively free OpenClaw is prone to getting out of control."